So much noise! The
Democratic debate over two nights showed us some remarkable traits exhibited by
the participants. Warren is as committed
and motivated as a freight train; Beto is all waving arms and not terribly
charismatic; Bernie is old news and not much different from 2016 (seems
strangely stale); Biden seems to be a step behind somehow and struggling to
connect his thoughts; Harris showed critical mettle as a prosecutor with clear
plans on how to accomplish things; and Gillibrand showed us she can outshout
anyone and is not particularly interested in listening. All the others had
their individual moments.
But the big surprise for me was how rude all of them were
with each other, not letting others finish their statements, or shouting over
them. Harris characterized it
correctly—it was a food fight. The only
two level-headed entries in this circus were Mayor Pete and Tulsi Gabbard. Those were the two who had the most patience
and seemed to be centered in the most secure way to comment and consider paths
of action.
Who the Democrats choose as nominee to lead the charge
against Edna will have to be someone who will meet Edna’s manic vitriol with a
level of intelligence that is frankly beyond Edna’s ability. Age has nothing to do with this ability. This kind of intelligence is measured, razor
sharp, and can search and destroy lies and fallacious reasoning like a hot
knife through butter.
That is the kind of person I want navigating a world with hair-trigger dangers everywhere. She sees Edna for what he really is: a true threat to national security. Dealing with that is certainly in her wheelhouse. Besides, she seems to be the only candidate who really wants us to end the wars we are in, based on her first hand experience with it.
So maybe the dream ticket is Buttigeig/Gabbard.
Look at that spectacle over those two nights and you see an
event made for media. How important was
that audience? They were only there for
media effect and wasted precious minutes with their clapping. Wouldn’t it have been better to conduct
interviews over a period of 5 nights with a panel of reporters querying 2
candidates at a time in a quiet setting so we could consider and analyze their
thoughts and positions? Not nearly as
sensational, but we already have sensationalism and it is not edifying.
If the Democrats don’t stop shouting and trying to outdo
each other with their Spanish, they are headed for defeat. Let’s winnow down the candidates by making
them discuss in detail their plans and strategy for restoring the country’s
moral direction. There needs to be a
different format for that, and I am not sure Tom Perez, Chairman of the
Democratic Party, is a believer in that process.
Also, in other news, there was a ruling by the Supreme Court
on Friday that was an appalling decision for our democracy. The Court declined responsibility to prohibit
partisan gerrymandering. They basically cleared the way for state legislators
to create voting districts in their states that favor minority rule. For example, if the Republicans win in the
State legislature they can create the shape of a district so it contains only
their supporters, thereby insuring control over the next decade at least by
their party. Or they can draw a district
in a state like Alabama where the shape of that district contains virtually all
the minority residents in the state, thereby minimizing the effect of their
voting power. This is a clear abdication
on the part of the Supreme Court to protect the voting rights of all of us
citizens. In states where there is
already rampant disregard for voting rights especially of minorities, we will
now see unfettered gerrymandering proceed to it’s ultimate unfair result. Goodbye democracy! This is the first of what will probably be
many victories for the Republican strategy to stack the courts with right wing
activist judges. Goodbye rule of law.