Webster's Definition of democracy
a: government by the people especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation involving periodically held free elections
If you consider Webster's definition, there are several elements which seem to stand out right away:
--government by the majority
--representation involving free elections
On both those counts if you look at current day America, one sees glaring contradictions in meeting those definitions.
In addition, our elected representatives have engaged in a process called gerrymandering which thwarts the concept of representative government. Over the past several decades, Republicans have been creating voting precincts and districts specifically to enhance the voting power of a particular group: their own. This is not the essence of true representation. We are seeing continuing efforts by Republicans to create voting districts that favor their political party, creating hundreds of 'safe' Republican seats. This makes representative government impossible since it creates election districts where a majority of its citizen's voices cannot be heard or represented.
In addition, we are seeing the Republican party, which is ascendant in a majority of state
legislatures, purposely passing new laws that give the legislatures of these states the power to simply disregard the results of an election if they decide for whatever reason that there is some 'irregularity' that they perceive, without the presentation of proof or evidence. How is that a 'free and fair election'? The filibuster, of course, has no place in state legislatures since that would thwart 'majority rule', which is what the legislators will claim gives them the right to throw out the results of an election. How ironic! This is what happens in 'Banana Republics'! Just look at the attempted shenanigans that we witnessed in the 2020 election in Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. These new laws being passed will make it easier to disregard the voice of the voters with impunity.Democracy depends on accountability. Unless a democracy can hold lawbreakers accountable, there is no consequence for wrongdoing. What we have witnessed is a total disregard for the rule of law by the previous administration: denial of subpoenas, withholding of information during investigations, pardons given to personal friends of the previous President who are clearly criminals, lying to the American people, and now using the Justice Department to investigate political enemies, etc. We all want to look forward and deal with the present and future challenges that face us as a nation, but unless we have some accountability for the emerging facts concerning actions of the previous administration that clearly broke the law, we will be destined to see another executive who will do the same or worse than Trump.
I return to my first question: Are we still a democracy? I frankly don't think we are right now. If we continue to harbor without consequence the bad actors who have led us to this place, our democracy will be a sham.
No comments:
Post a Comment